ROADMAP
of startup and VC ecosystem in Belarus
Belarus has significant potential as one of the most dynamic innovation centers in Central and Eastern Europe. The only obstacle to the realization of this potential are the social and economic problems, the solutions to which are far beyond the competencies of the Belarusian VC and tech startup ecosystem.
The basic principles of any economic system are transparent and balanced legislation, protection of private property and freedom of thought and expression. Political freedoms and democratic government are also the fundamental principles for any successful venture or initiative. These conditions are critical because the government plays an important role in building and developing the entrepreneurial ecosystem. None of the recommendations listed below can change the Belarusian startup ecosystem if the basic principles are not respected.
chapter 1
The Main Elements of the Tech Startups and VC Funding Ecosystem
THE EVOLUTION AND POTENTIAL OF BELARUSIAN STARTUPS AND VENTURE CAPITAL
The evolution of the global entrepreneurial ecosystem shows that regional resources — such as knowledge, talent, and funding — are focused on the infrastructure of leading hubs. After reaching the critical mass, the ecosystem begins to expand. It allows to attract direct foreign investments, helps develop the knowledge base, and opens new opportunities for both early-stage startups and companies at the growth stage. So what’s needed to build a successful startup and VC ecosystem?

The successful startup community includes many things: talents and engineers, coworking and networking, angel and VC investors, good schools and education/ research (for breakthroughs in IP), access to major corporations (for business, financing, and talents), and a developed ecosystem of mentors, advisers, and managers.

The community can do a lot for the ecosystem development: make it attractive for business development, involve experts and industry leaders, unite angel investors and VC capital. However, all of these conditions can bring long-term results only when the base terms of a democratic society are met. It’s been recently proved yet again by the Belarusian ecosystem example.

To start the ecosystem, only a few community leaders are needed. That’s what happened in Belarus when Imaguru built its first community, and the first success stories started to emerge. It’s important for startups but is not enough for the business community growth on a country level, especially today, in the middle of the Belarusian political crisis, when all prior achievements of the ecosystem were thrown several years back.

This study’s main goal is to analyze and give an assessment of what new Belarus could rely on to build a new successful startup and VC ecosystem, and which of its elements will have to be created from scratch.

There are several important conditions for long-term ecosystem development, and each of them is equally important. In 2013, Brad Feld wrote a book called Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. For the most part, Imaguru followed this approach when building its very first ecosystem in Belarus.
  • Tech founders pool
    We know that Belarus is a country of software engineers. But today talented engineers and teams can be found everywhere around the world. We also know that a lot of engineers in the Belarusian ecosystem are not connected to building startups and their own business ideas.

    What can be done to attract first-class engineers who want to achieve more?

    It’s important to motivate and nurture talents, involving engineers in the startup community. One of the tools to achieve this could be innovational programs for engineers, which would incentivize them to create their own startups. It’s also important to provide opportunities for communication between engineers and startup founders. We’ll talk more about this below.

  • Access to quality engineer and startup founder education
    It’s hard to imagine the creation of a tech startup community without access to first- class universities. After all, a dorm room became the birthplace of many great innovations, including Microsoft, Google and Facebook.

    Students are a great source of ideas because they’re ready to disrupt the existing norms.

    They also have the tech skills and more time to focus on the creation. Universities do not only become a birthplace for many startups, but also an important system for lots of young and hardworking talents.

    Our main goals include maintaining the best professionals in the local ecosystem and startups founded by Belarusians, and also ensure that those who left during the political crisis will return. It could be done through internships in local tech startups, university accelerator programs and so on. It’s also important to have teachers with practical entrepreneurial experience. Additionally, startups and local investment groups may also involve these professors as advisors since they are usually the best resource for finding talents earlier than others.
  • Events
    Major annual conferences attract people to the ecosystem. These events increase the awareness of investors and corporations about what’s happening inside the ecosystem. Additionally, it also provides founders and investors with the opportunity to connect, which is the foundation for future business partnerships. The current examples of these events include GEW Belarus, Venture Day Minsk and Emerge.

    Examples of the major international conferences include Web Summit Lisbon, earlier Dublin, or SLUSH in Helsinki. It’s important to note that governments of these countries recognize the economic benefit of international startups and VCs coming in and building companies there.

  • Coworking and startup hubs
    Putting the startup community together creates enormous opportunities for growth, promoting instant sharing of knowledge, talent and ideas. Plus, when a lot of startups are centered in one building or area (whether it’s a neighborhood or the whole city), it makes it easy for investors to learn about the entire pool of startups and meet all the founders at once.


    There aren’t many coworking spaces in Belarus. Until recently, the main player was Imaguru but it was shut down by the regime in April 2021, and since then continues to develop the ecosystem from abroad.
  • Success stories
    In the end, no efforts on ecosystem development will be able to create a successful startup community without the actual success stories. These success stories for Belarus were EPAM, Wargaming, PandaDoc, MSQRD, and others.

    In Estonia, Skype’s success story pushed the development of the whole tech cluster and eventually led Estonia to become one of the most successful tech ecosystems in the world.

    When there are actual success stories, there are also entrepreneurs who want to become founders of their next company. And by this time, they already have much more experience for it. No matter whether these serial entrepreneurs emerge from successful or failed startups, they still got the experience from their previous venture. If an entrepreneur treats failure correctly, next ventures will be even more successful and even on a grander scale. It’s also closely related to how the community treats failure, and how developed is the entrepreneurial culture overall. The key feature of the true entrepreneurial culture is risk and failure tolerance.

  • Community of angel investors
    Even though initial expenses to start a tech company are relatively low, founders still need early-stage funding to hire the team, release the product, and promote it. The issue that was present in Belarus at a certain point was that many wealthy people represented traditional businesses and were not connected with the world of tech startups, which became a trend just a few years ago. It doesn’t make traditional businessmen bad investors, they are just less effective in making quick decisions whether to invest in a startup or not, and their funding terms usually weren’t acceptable for an early-stage startup that would become VC-funded later on. One of the first angel investor communities was Bavin. However, they were not able to succeed due to many reasons, including the gap between the tech startup community and the traditional business approach.

    While working with the startup community, we quickly realized that angel investors have to be trained and organized. That’s why we created the very first angel investor training course at Imaguru, which became the foundation for the angel investor network Angels Band. During GEW 2016, the Belarusian Business Angel Network (BBAN) was born. In 2018, it was transformed into the Belarusian Business Angel Association Angels Band. The first graduation of the Business Angel Academy at Imaguru took place in 2017. The active Belarusian angel investors are graduates of the academy. Nowadays, Imaguru also developed a whole learning platform for investors: https://vc.imaguru.co/

    Today Belarusian angel investors make their first partner deals and most likely will be able to unite their capital in the future, perhaps creating a fund managed by the investment committee. This fund would be able to take more risks and standardize funding terms. It could bring a lot of benefit for the local startup community since it would provide opportunities for more deals inside the ecosystem, even at the early startup stages.
    As regional markets see big wins or successful exits, this invested capital often returns to the startup ecosystem as an angel investment for other startups. As the startup community has more successful exits and more new entrepreneurs, the growth of the local ecosystem becomes inevitable.

    There are two reasons why local capital is needed. First, there’s a very slim chance that a serious investor would agree to fund a startup that’s outside of their geographical area until that startup achieves a certain level of success or recognition. That’s why the first round is almost always raised locally. The second reason to have local capital (in this case, venture capital) is that without it every growth-stage company would have to talk to VC investors abroad, who will want this company to relocate to a different area. That’s what happens in Belarus today due to many factors, which are not always connected with VC investors.
    Being in the same place for an investor and a startup does have a logic behind it. If an investor works with a company at the early stage, they would need to spend a lot of time together, which means they would need to be located geographically close.
  • Venture capital
    Of course, a very important component of any startup community is venture capital. To expand, the startup would need to raise significant funds and possibly gain access to tech giants of Silicon Valley, which often comes with VC investors.

    Since there is no legal framework for VC in Belarus yet, traditional VC funds still do not exist here. Successful investors who can raise capital around their team are forced to register their funds abroad, even if their main focus remains on Belarusian founders. Mainly these funds are formed on the so-called secondary capital, which includes entrepreneurs who are investing back into the community after their successful exit. It leads to a great number of angel investors and funds who help the next generation of entrepreneurs.

    This is why the new VC legislation should become one of the first steps for forming the VC ecosystem in new Belarus. To further encourage the creation of funds, it’s also important to use a mechanism of the fund of funds, which combines funds of many investors and then invests the whole amount in VC funds (for example, VC funds of large corporations and, possibly, the government).

    The purpose of the fund of funds is what’s called double revenue in the startup world. This mutual fund is dedicated to increasing revenue by raised capital, also contributing to the development of the national ecosystem.

  • Champions and marketing
    Every community needs its champions — people who attract others to the community and also make sure that new startups would be known beyond the community, too. They are like a connecting link between the community and those who are beyond it.

    These people are critical. They spend a lot of time on planes, traveling the world and learning about companies and ideas. These are the people who spread the word and encourage others to join the ecosystem. In Belarus, successful entrepreneurs could become those champions — for example, Mikita Mikado, Michael Rumiantsau, Dmitry Gursky, Nikolai Oreshkin, Dmitry Birulia and many others.

    Marketing efforts and branding are also very important. Every local community needs its own unique branding built around its most distinctive and impressive feature. There is no need to replicate Silicon Valley, not all ecosystems in the world are built around silicon. Copying someone else could never be impressive.

    Local press/websites/organizations also could be involved in the marketing efforts.

  • Local tech companies
    Local tech companies that achieve success on the global market are creating opportunities like no one else.


    Among 100 top global outsourcing companies are four Belarusian ones: EPAM, IBA, Itransition and Intetics. Experts note that every direct job position in the tech industry creates four indirect job positions in the economy. Belarusian IT professionals are some of the most qualified in the region. Almost half of all IT professionals work in five companies: EPAM, Wargaming/Game Stream, IBA Group, Itransition and iTechArt Group. EPAM remains the major employer in IT, employing over 10,000 professionals in their Belarusian office. Nowadays, the company is also expanding its foreign locations.


  • Ecosystem culture
    We can talk a lot about entrepreneurial culture and relationships inside the ecosystem. This is one of the most important (if not the most important) elements in building a successful ecosystem. Analyzing everything that was said and written on this topic recently, we found one publication particularly interesting — sharing it below.


70%
Belarusian startup founders have already left Belarus
chapter 2
Evaluation And Issues of the Belarusian Ecosystem At the Current Stage
The ecosystem of tech startups in Belarus isn’t even 10 years old, which means it’s still at the very early stages.

Even though the country does have a lot of potential, it’s entering the new decade with the undermined image, crisis, and business founders that are fleeing the country. At the same time, a lot of neighboring countries show a lot of interest in Belarusian tech startups. Due to the deep political crisis, all the past ecosystem achievements are now in jeopardy.

In early 2020, the Belarusian startup ecosystem has matured in comparison to its state three years ago. Startups started raising more capital, teams became more diversified, more startups became profitable. Even during the pandemic, 82.4% of startups didn’t stop and just reformatted their business model following the changes. It wasn’t COVID-19 that destroyed the Belarusian startup ecosystem, it was the political crisis. This is the time of unprecedented pressure on Belarusian businesses, both internally and externally.

Just two years ago, most startups (75.4%) stated investor shortage as their main issue. However, this year they identified their main threats in legal default (61.5%), lack of legitimate authority (54,8%), and lack of trust in the judicial system (26.9%). Since July 2020, the massive business exodus from Belarus does not stop. Nowadays Minsk is no longer a geographical center of the ecosystem as teams work remotely.

Startups point out the following major consequences of the political crisis: business exodus (52%), change of plans and additional costs (45%), deterioration in access to external financing (32%), threats to business development (28.5%), and decrease in work efficiency (27%).

The crisis has negatively impacted the entire Belarusian business, no matter whether the company decided to relocate, or not. 58% of Belarusian startups have fled the country. Only 4% of startups noted that they’re not planning to relocate.

A quarter of all Belarusian entrepreneurs are not planning to return to Belarus. For the rest of them, the condition of return is democratic change. 70% of startups think that the consequences of the political crisis will continue until after 2023.

Most startups build their plans outside of Belarus and plan to raise capital from foreign funds. At the same time, they think that it’s important to continue developing the Belarusian ecosystem abroad and are ready to help in the solidarity initiatives.

Only 3% of startups are planning to raise funds from Belarusian investors next year.

The image of Belarus as a geographical location is destroyed, and there is no sense to talk about any investment appeal at this point. Once a promising hub, the country and the ecosystem inside the country have now turned into ruins.

chapter 3
Roadmap of the Startup And VC Ecosystem For New Belarus
The ecosystem of this roadmap is built on the following four principles:
  • Nurturing talent
  • Legal reforms
  • Expanding access to funding
  • Promoting the business relationship culture
Every dynamic ecosystem in the world requires at least several elements to work really well (see the full list in Chapter 1), that’s why we gathered several recommendations combining the best practices in the world. This roadmap is prepared by the Imaguru team based on our practical experience in building the tech startup ecosystem in Belarus.
We would like to define the main aspects of our practical recommendations. First, this roadmap is dedicated to building the ecosystem in new Belarus because the founding elements of its creation are democratic government, protection of private property rights, and the rule of law, among others. The proposed reforms are not the goals of this study. However, without them, any recommendations regarding the business ecosystem don’t have much sense.
NURTURING TALENT

Our team is confident that nurturing talent is the main priority because specifically here Belarus has a lot of competitive advantages. Belarus has exceptional technical talent and experience, and a very high index of human development. According to the Global Skills Index, Belarusians rank second in the world’s rating of innovative technologies and eights in data science. Belarusians take first place in software development championships and start innovative startups.

Tech talent could become the primary characteristic of Belarus and the main marketing feature of its ecosystem (read more about its importance in Chapter 1). According to our Belarus Startup Report 2021, 84% of startups are founded by people with an engineering degree.
LEGASLATIVE REFORMS

Legislative reform and the rule of law are the foundation of the basic legal infrastructure in startup and VC development. As stated earlier, at this point there is no legislative basis of VC fund formation and there is no incentive for the development of angel investments and startups.

Our attempts to incorporate the best global practices into the Belarusian law were correct, however, they came into effect at the worst possible time. Thanks to our team’s efforts earlier in 2018-2020, the mechanisms of a convertible loan, stock options, the preemptive right to purchase shares waiver, improvement of the shareholder agreement institution, were achieved.

However, it’s unacceptable to apply these mechanisms under the conditions of the negative investment climate in the country, as well as the lack of rights and guarantees to the investor.
EXPANDING ACCESS TO FUNDING

According to our research within the past several years, access to funds is still one of the main issues for startups. Recently, angel investment started to develop more rapidly. We think it’s important to continue developing this mechanism, establishing tax and other incentives for early-stage investors.
For the later company stages, the funding tools are extremely limited in Belarus. We’ve already noted the absence of VC funds, the fund of funds, and other financial organizations of this type. All these tools will have to be developed from scratch to attract investors.
PROMOTING THE BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP CULTURE

Despite some recent improvements in the Belarusian startup ecosystem, the overall startup and business culture leaves much to be desired. Focus on partnership and trust between the ecosystem members would improve communication and knowledge, helping create and identify promising startups faster, connecting them with both local and foreign investors, accelerators, and markets.

It’s also important to have clear and straightforward data monitoring. Without it, the new Belarusian government will still not be able to understand which initiatives are working, and which ones need improvement. Without this data, it’s also impossible to identify the metrics of funds invested in every initiative, including startup hub, incubator, or angel investor network.
When there is an effective structure in place, a critical mass and critical experience in several areas of the Belarusian ecosystem will be created.
chapter 4
Priorities
PRIORITY OF NURTURING TALENT
Measure 1. Improving the education on entrepreneurship
Background

This measure offers the national program and strategies that are connected to the improvement of university education on entrepreneurship.

Specific actions:
1. Incentivizing entrepreneurship education.
Incentivize and apply special stimulus for universities to kickstart entrepreneurship courses. These incentives may include specific state financing connected to the results of entrepreneurship activities and stimulus for university professors to become part of the entrepreneurial activities as part of their effectiveness criteria.

2. Inviting entrepreneurs into the academic community.
Nowadays, school requirements don’t allow entrepreneurs and mentors who don’t have a teaching degree to talk to students. These rules should be softened, so educational institutions could provide their students with more instant access to entrepreneurs. Universities also should involve professors with work experience in the private sector (for example, through changing the staffing requirements).

3. Educating the current professors with actual entrepreneurial experience.
To increase teachers’ level of practical knowledge, we recommend launching a program for advanced training. For example, it could include funding of foreign visits for Belarusian personnel to the leading global business ecosystems (Silicon Valley, Berlin, London, etc), as well as the realization of resolutions seen abroad.

Rationale
Universities play an important role in developing entrepreneurial culture. However, many entrepreneurs complain that their university degree didn’t give them any practical knowledge or skills. Especially alarming is the fact that teachers have very limited knowledge of the real economy. Factual communication with successful entrepreneurs would improve their ability to nurture entrepreneurial talents.
This measure would allow for the development and realization of initiatives to encourage entrepreneurship, ensuring a long-term development of human capital.

Beneficiaries:
  • Students
  • University personnel
PRIORITY OF LEGAL REFORMS
Measure 2. Legislative reform of the VC industry
Background

Development and implementation of the legal reforms and tax incentives for improvement of the business management process and incentivizing VC investments in tech startups.

Specific actions:
1. Legal framework for VC funds and angel investors.
Develop a regulatory framework that defines VC capital and regulates VC funds, angel investors and investments of a mutual angel investors’ fund.

2. Applying the term of convertible loan into the Belarusian legislation.
While the Business Entities Law now allows applying a convertible loan mechanism, in reality, this legislation doesn’t have an actual term “convertible loan” in place. For now, these types of deals are happening only with the HTP residents.

3. Stock options.
Change the legal framework related to business entities, creating legal and tax incentives and introducing stock options to employees. The most recent changes to the law allowed startups to offer stock options to their employees (either for monetary compensation or at no charge), even if the team consists of only two people. Regardless, this is just a minor change that will not have any major impact on simplifying the legislative framework in this field.

4. Digitizing the company registration process.
That would allow making the company registration process much more simple, straightforward, and streamlined since there will be fewer required procedures and time spent.

5. Incentivizing VC investors.
There are a couple of ways how to incentivize VC investors. Let’s take tax and investment incentives as an example and take a look at the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) in the UK. Another incentive could also be provided to corporate VC investors for funding tech startups.

6. Crowdfunding.
Develop the legal infrastructure of crowdfunding platforms development in Belarus.

Rationale
Since there is no regulatory framework for VC investments and tech startups in Belarus, entrepreneurs are not able to properly structure their company. For instance, startups usually award their employees with stock, however, that’s a very difficult route under the current Belarusian law.

There is still not a single VC organization in Belarus, which proves that there is no legal or regulatory framework in the country that would allow it to exist.

Within 2016-2020, several expert groups were working on the recommendations designed to simplify VC activities in Belarus. As a result, some of these recommendations got into the updated version of the Business Entities Law, which came into effect on April 28, 2021.

However, some of the key propositions are missing from the updated framework, including simplification of company creation, and incentivizing investment and alternative funding models, including crowdfunding. The lack of a clear legal framework for VC deals turns down investors, especially those who are abroad.

Beneficiaries:
  • Startup investors (angel investors, angel investor syndicates, VC investors, early- stage investors, investment companies, equity funds, crowdfunding websites, corporate investors, etc)
  • Startup founders
  • Startup team members
PRIORITY OF ACCESS TO FUNDING
Measure 3. Сreation of a fund of funds
Background

This measure allows for the creation of the fund of funds, involving the government and private sector’s capital.

Specific actions:
1. Creation of the fund of funds.
The government could be the sole or partial founder of such a fund through specific dedicated entities. This fund would work with partners from the private sector (for example, angel investors, seed and venture investors, incubators, accelerators). This fund would not be investing in startups directly, but rather provide capital for VC funds and take advantage of their experience in making investment decisions.

2. Joint creation of the fund’s investment thesis.
The fund’s investment thesis could include the definition of the investment stages, sectors, or types of entrepreneurs who need targeted support.

3. Deciding on targeted funding.
The fund will have to review the results of its activities through the beneficiaries. Depending on the investment thesis, it may be reasonable to define goals and control investments based on specific priority stages — for example, in sectors, technologies, female entrepreneurs, etc.

Rationale
Even with the regulatory reforms described in this chapter above, many Belarusian VC funds will remain undercapitalized. In many European countries, the support of VC funds is successfully used for raising private funds instead of removing private investors from the process.

Beneficiaries:
  • Early-stage angel investors, seed investors, VC fund
  • Startups
PRIORITY OF THE ECOSYSTEM GROWTH
Measure 4. Strengthening of the ecosystem members
Background

This measure is developing the program of new and existing organizations that provide the ecosystem with opportunities, ensuring productive work.

Specific actions:
1. The partnership of the ecosystem members under the idea of uniting.
This measure is dedicated to building a strong community that unites startups and startup support organizations with investors — at the same time representing Belarusian startups in the international arena. The coalition of Belarusian ecosystem members should encourage partnership, diversity and interdisciplinary knowledge, forming a united strategy of the ecosystem development. Diversification of the coalition members is also important and must consider gender aspects and other inclusivity.

2. Allocation of grants to increase the capacity of the organizations promoting growth.
They could be used in different measures, including financial support of the existing operations and development of new programs for entrepreneurs, subsidizing startup team members attending foreign ecosystems, creation of international guest lectures and allowing for knowledge sharing and partnership between the organizations.

3. Allocation of grants to universities to promote their partnership with startups. These grants would help universities to work with the organizations that support and encourage entrepreneurship. These organizations could include accelerators and other educational programs.

4. Allocation of grants for chambers of commerce and other business associations.
Currently, existing chambers of commerce and other business associations are not considered “startup-friendly.” However, these grants would be dedicated to these specific organizations, to encourage them to include startups in their networks. It’ll also help these traditional business organizations understand startups better.

5. Allocation of grants for industry conferences and forums.
Major nationwide events that unite both startups and larger companies on a city/ state/country level help all of them to establish connections in the ecosystem. It also helps to create connections with other global ecosystems and share their knowledge, promoting Belarusian startups on the global stage.

Rationale
Succesful ecosystems usually have several support organizations, including incubators, accelerators and professional networks. Many of them provide services (for example, training courses on product-market fit), which are unavailable in other channels.

We’re proposing to create the same system through a series of state-financed grants which will be used for the improvement of work and potential of the organizations — for example, through incentivizing knowledge-sharing between organizations in the leading ecosystems.

Beneficiaries:
  • Ecosystem member
  • Incubator
  • Professional networks
  • Business associations
  • Startups(indirectly)
PRIORITY OF THE ECOSYSTEM GROWTH
Measure 5. Support of startups at the growth stage: from a startup to a scaleup
Background

Within this framework, startups would be able to enter foreign markets and therefore expand and grow faster.

Specific actions:
1. Development of international “landing sites” for startups.
Development of the support centers abroad at the key markets - for example, co- working space for new Belarusian startups. These landing sites would have tight connections with local embassies, also consulting on visas, immigration, etc. They would be also encouraging mutual support and knowledge-sharing between Belarusian startups, diaspora, etc.

2. Expanding of opportunities for Belarusian startups abroad.
To improve the positions of the Belarusian startups on the global market, we could do an annual showoff of the leading companies and talents. It should include more effective use of embassies and consulates and participation in the leading international events, such as TC Disrupt, Web Summit, Slush, etc.

3. Creating the Belarusian entrepreneurship diaspora network.
The mass exodus of Belarusian talents abroad is a fact. We’re proposing to turn it into a strength and build a strong international network of Belarusian diaspora entrepreneurs. This network could be funded and curated with the support of state financing or commercial organizations. This network would be also able to provide contact and information about the local market to the other startups that plan to expand on the global markets.

Rationale
The internal market is not big enough for many startups in specific sectors and business models with the potential to expand. Therefore, export becomes necessary to achieve scale. Many entrepreneurs don’t understand the terms and culture of foreign markets and don’t know where to start. Often it happens because foreign networks are not developed and trade attachés do not understand startups. To expand to a global market, startups need support from the government side and Belarusian trade missions abroad.

Beneficiaries:
  • Startup
  • Broader business ecosystem
PRIORITY OF THE ECOSYSTEM GROWTH
Measure 6. Development of the technology transfer
Background

This measure proposes the development of a program to improve technology transfer at universities and scientific institutions. Among others, this measure would also include the change in the regulatory framework. It would encourage the creation of a large number of subsidiaries and help the existing companies to create and develop innovative products or services.

Specific actions:
1. Encouraging partnership between educational and scientific institutions with the business sector.
One of the best approaches would be to develop and apply special incentives for universities to encourage entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial activities. For example, it could be a rating of entrepreneurial leaders, specific financing based on the business results, or entrepreneurial activity as part of the effectiveness criteria. The government should ask for specific annual Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) from every university or scientific institution. For example, it could be the number of patents, the number of created companies, contract effectiveness studies, etc.

2. Creation of the technology transfer fund.
Just like the Higher Education Innovation Fund (HEIF) in the UK, this technology transfer fund would be a pool of the state funds allocated on the programs for technology transfer between educational and scientific institutions. For example, it could be study visits, creation of networks and practical knowledge sharing, partnerships with local entrepreneurs, funding of modern laboratories and increasing awareness of the intellectual property law.

3. Reform of the legal framework on intellectual property protection.
This framework could be similar to The Bayh-Dole Act, formerly known as the Patent and Trademark Act Amendments, which enables universities, nonprofit research institutions and small businesses to own, patent and commercialize inventions developed under federally funded research programs within their organizations.

Rationale
In many countries, universities have subsidiary companies that are typically created by the technology transfer funds. These entities also work on patenting and licensing of intellectual property, which could help the existing companies to apply innovations and strengthen their competitive advantages. Additionally, many universities help establish connections between startups and corporations, acting as neutral brokers. That’s why the proper functioning of the technology transfer funds is essential for entrepreneurial growth.

Beneficiaries:
  • Universitie
  • Scientific research institutions
  • Technology transfer organizations
  • VC and other investor
  • Startup founders
PRIORITY OF THE ECOSYSTEM GROWTH
Measure 7. Priority of the innovative startups’ development for the Belarusian economy
Background

This measure allows defining the industry of technological and innovative startups and VC investments into a priority field for the Belarusian economy.

Specific actions:
1. Creation and funding of a new organization that would act as a “voice” of the whole startup ecosystem, representing startups, investors and support organizations, allowing for more tight coordination and support on the local level.

2. Developing and piloting the new governmental support measures.
These could be programs for startups at the early stages, programs of corporate innovation development, programs on expanding the potential and growth (i.e. training courses for national and regional government employees, master classes for accelerator managers, etc), and also for entrepreneurs themselves.

3. Real-time data monitoring and gathering.
This is a crucial part for receiving the actual real-time data, which would help to monitor the results and also make effective decisions on expanding or phasing out certain initiatives.

4. Political legitimacy on all levels.
To ensure an effective partnership between the government and private sector, the government needs to cooperate with the regional agencies, mayors and city administrations to empathize on the importance of these organizations and ensure they have their autonomy to make decisions.

5. Creation of “sandboxes” and “test platforms”.
These test platforms should be two-sided, helping the startups to understand how to work within the specific framework, and help the regulatory body to understand how to work with startups and what could potentially be changed.

Rationale
The Belarusian startup ecosystem is facing multiple challenges, including a lack of understanding of the startup term itself. For instance, the government and other institutions still don’t understand the differences between a startup and a small business. Despite some promising regional clusters, Belarusian startups don’t have a voice that would allow them to make themselves heard.

Beneficiaries:
  • City residents
  • Government bodie
  • Centers of digital innovation(indirectly)
PRIORITY OF THE ECOSYSTEM GROWTH
Measure 8. Startup residency
Background

This measure would help to mitigate the impact of the massive exodus of Belarusian talent abroad — through the return of talents from the diaspora and attracting business experts and managers from other markets.

Specific actions:
1. Legal framework for a startup residence.
The development of a Belarusian startup residence would allow a simplified and streamlined digital schema of startup creation, involving founders and investors abroad, including the Belarusian diaspora.

2. Incentives for digital nomads.
Incentives for digital nomads could encourage the relocation of international experts of different fields to Belarus, building upon the popular concept of “remote work from any place.” This package could define who could be the digital nomad, and also offer certain advantages, such as help to register for a residency in Belarus, local tax law incentives, remote education, etc.

Rationale
Access to talent is the key success factor for startups. Nowadays, many Belarusian startups complain that they’re unable to find and keep the talent. This is the issue of many ecosystems but it also gets worse due to the mass exodus of talent from Belarus.

The “Digital Nomad” schema is currently used in many countries and would allow to mitigate this issue and attract more talent from abroad. Some of its advantages would also include a relatively cheap cost of living, availability of talent and a good professional network.

Beneficiaries:
  • Foreign startup employees, founders and investor
  • Investors and talents from the Belarusian diaspora
PRIORITY OF THE ECOSYSTEM GROWTH
Measure 9. Incentives for the internal market of digital product development
Background

This measure is focused on increasing the availability of the internal startup market through incentivizing business commercialization and digitization.

Specific actions:
1. Training on digital commerce and business digitization.
This is the program of development and incentivizing of basic internet education in remote, non-urban areas. It could be done through grants provided through the educational institutions, possibly in collaboration with local government and social organizations.

2. Development of digital services in government bodies.

Rationale
Many startups are digital. However, Belarus business digitization is one of the lowest in Europe. It restricts the available internal market for many startups.

This issue exists due to several reasons, including a low level of digital technology skills, lack of trust in online transactions, as well as uneven digital infrastructure. Another reason is the fact that not all businesses understand the potential advantages of digitization and innovations, which startups could bring.

Beneficiaries:
  • Startups
  • Broader business ecosystem
  • Consumers
PRIORITY OF THE ECOSYSTEM GROWTH
Measure 10. Tax and other preferences for tech companies.
Background

If a government prioritizes the innovation and VC industry, tax and other incentives are the most logical and reasonable measures. This is also the most popular measure in many countries. However, it’s also important for Belarus to avoid repeating the negative experience of the Hi-Tech Park (HTP) when incentives were provided only to a very small group of companies that belong to a certain business caste. At the same time, we cannot even call HTP a community, because it didn’t protect the interests of its members and simply played an administratively controlling role, which often became even repressive.

Specific actions:
1. Applying incentives to all companies that participate in innovative and VC activities.
Every company that works in innovation and VC activities directly or indirectly should have a right to receive all the incentives that were given out to a narrow “business caste” at HTP.

2. Removing the special approval process for a company to join a certain group or association that’s entitled to tax incentives.
We don’t need HTP for approving tax incentives. These norms and incentives should be available for all companies based on straightforward and clear criteria.

3. Develop clear criteria for companies that are allowed to receive tax incentives. Any company without regard to its size, revenue, stage, business and investment plans, should have an opportunity to join the organization. Additionally, investors and VC funds should also be able to participate if they wish to.

Rationale
Belarusian companies that currently work in innovation and VC industries do not have any incentives at all unless they are a member of HTP. Also, there’s still no clear legal definition of innovative or VC company, which complicates the process even further.

At the early company stage, many startups are not able to join HTP due to their revenue level, which contradicts the very definition of incentivizing startup innovation.

Beneficiaries:
  • Startup
  • Broader business ecosystem
  • Consumers
SUMMARY
Currently, there are no real incentives for business or innovation in Belarus. After the political reform, there should be a global reform of the business industry, too. The new government of Belarus will play an important role in this process, developing the strategy based on the set of measures described in this study.
In this study, we proposed the roadmap of the Belarusian startup ecosystem after the country’s democratization takes place. This set of measures should be coordinated between the government and the society, which will become an important and respected voice.
The strategy of startup and VC ecosystem development is focusing on the strongest sides of the Belarusian ecosystem, including access to talent and certain economic advantages, such as generally lower costs for products, services and labor. The success of this roadmap depends on the willingness of the new Belarusian government to build a successful business ecosystem, getting support from international organizations and the Belarusian diaspora.
This future strategy is based on the principles of rule of law and basic human rights and freedoms. If these are not followed, no successful business system would be able to exist in the long term.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience
OK